Welcome to Liverpool Confidential
Reset Password
The Confidential websites will be undergoing routine updates. This may cause the sites to go offline. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience.

You are here: Liverpool ConfidentialNews & Comment.

The Laz word...says scrap Council Tax altogether

This year’s council elections are the most crucial in Liverpool since 1998. So this week will the Lib Dems actually <i>reduce</i> the sting to win us over?

Published on March 2nd 2010.


The Laz word...says scrap Council Tax altogether

WIRRAL'S Tories want a zero increase in Council Tax, joining Liverpool which has already announced a stay-as-you-are level.

The Government would fund local councils with the cost added on to general taxation. It would mean tax payers would fund local services, a uniform level across the country added on to PAYE. No need for expensive municipal treasury or benefit departments

But the big question is whether Warren Bradley’s Lib Dems will go one even better at this Wednesday’s crucial Budget meeting this week – and effectively lower the Council Tax.

As things stand, the bills dropping through letter boxes across the city in the coming weeks will slightly increase, because the police and fire authorities, both chaired by Labour, have increased their costs.

Warren will no doubt, as I write, be seeking to find some spare cash from the council coffers to absorb the police and fire increases so that on your bit of paper it is essentially the same.

This year’s council elections on May 6 are the most crucial in Liverpool since 1998 when Mike Storey dispatched Labour to the political sidelines. At one time, the Lib Dems ruled Liverpool with a majority of over 60 seats, and now it’s wittled down to the narrowest possible margin. That paves the way for Joe Anderson and Labour to retake control.

Wednesday’s budget debate will reveal all.

Across the board, local councils have been given notice of massive cut-backs in spending, whoever wins the General Election. Liverpool fears it will suffer badly if government cash is cut back.

So here is a novel idea from the Neild manifesto – let’s scrap Council Tax altogether, make it free. No more Council Tax bills with all the unfair and inequitable rules.

Margaret Thatcher attempted change with the poll tax. Least said about that the better. So here’s how my regime would work.

Less than one-fifth of council spending is raised by Council Tax, the rest comes from HM Government. Yet to collect that fifth there has to be a cumbersome collection system at every council offices, and a benefits system to help the worst-off.

Instead, the Government would fund local councils with the cost added on to general taxation. It would mean tax payers would fund local services, a uniform level across the country added on to PAYE. No need for expensive municipal treasury or benefit departments.

It would release millions of pounds into local economies because the cost would be spread across wage earners.

Critics will say it will erase local decision making. Not with my system: the Local Government Commission would announce funding for each council, covering four years, based on inflation. Political parties would then produce local manifestos stating how they would manage local government over four years.

Elections would then take place every four years with voters having the chance to sack the administration if it has performed badly.

The present system needs change. There are homes, say in Band D, with three or more wage earners paying a fixed amount for council services, while a single occupant in a Band E or F home will pay more.

The Lib Dems have in the past favoured a local income tax, but that would be even more expensive than the current system of collection.

With a national system the country’s best collection agency, HM Inland Revenue, would gently take the money from our wage packets.

*Ed's note Wirral Council's Labour and Liberal Democrat-led administration voted through its budget for a 1.67 per cent increase in Council Tax at a meeting of the full council last night (Mon) in Wallasey Town Hall. Council leader Steve Foulkes said the current economic forecast meant he did not think “this is the year to go for zero”.

Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.

8 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.

AnonymousMarch 1st 2010.

Council taxes are beyond a joke. We're paying around 27 quid a week for services, and look at what we get. And to make matters worse Liverpool council stings city workers for even more with their sky high parking charges. They just want high wages for the officers and they don't care how much they sting us for.

Lucid of Little BongsMarch 1st 2010.

Nutcase!

Nik16March 1st 2010.

Passport to Liverpool, ur a idiot. U want passports for scousers but wud no way wk bcuz even az there iz a passport office in Liverpool it wud not stop the people takin the jods cux there are not any left

AnonymousMarch 1st 2010.

Wt d fk iz she on abt?

PassportToLiverpoolMarch 1st 2010.

Scrap the Council Tax. Great Idea. Liverpool could even issue its own passports and declare independence. Yea, let's go for it.

DigMarch 1st 2010.

I'm sure the irony is lost on Nik16 on PTL's rant and how Nik16 starts, then ends their own rant. Keep up the good work.

London RoadMarch 1st 2010.

Quite right that Wirral should be realistic in these hard times. Why are Bradley and co allowed to mess around with municipal spending, care homes, schools, jobs and services just to save their own political skins?

scousekrautMarch 1st 2010.

If I was involved in the financial running of Liverpool I would be researching the viability of introducing a regional currency and/or alternative currency such as those in parts of Germany and In Brazil. Argentina also has a lot of experience in social credit systems.A regional currency is a voucher whose value is pegged to the GBP. You swap pounds for vouchers. These vouchers can then be spent at any business that accepts them. If you hold on to them instead of spending them you are penalised. The opposite of our banking system. This means that the vouchers circulate freely and increase economic activity.I would also look into the possibilty of founding a state owned bank for the area based on the very successful Bank of North Dakota that was founded in 1919. It lends money at low interest rates to local businesses and its assets are the buildings and land owned by the state. This means it does not need any deposits.There are many alternatives to the current absurd debt based money system almost all of which are an improvement. It just needs the political will to change things and take on the power of the International Bankers.

To post this comment, you need to login.Please complete your login information.
OR CREATE AN ACCOUNT HERE..
Or you can login using Facebook.

Latest Rants

Anonymous

I agree with the Councillor. His examples really don't go far enough, because of the complexities…

 Read more
Anonymous

Perhaps a "dolmus" system could be used in the city centre, they work quite well for tourists and…

 Read more
Fairminded

Not price related but sad to see that they are doing away with the Citylink bus. This runs around…

 Read more
Anonymous

Thank you Woo

 Read more

Explore The Site

© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2017

Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code