Welcome to Liverpool Confidential
Reset Password
The Confidential websites will be undergoing routine updates. This may cause the sites to go offline. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience.

You are here: Liverpool ConfidentialNews & Comment.

Liverpool link to HS2 demanded in new campaign

Lord Derby, Tom Morris and others pen open letter calling for £1.5m branch line

Published on January 31st 2014.


Liverpool link to HS2 demanded in new campaign
 

LORD DERBY has joined forces with the founder of Home & Bargain, Tom Morris, to call for a £1.5bn rail track to link Liverpool to the HS2 network. 

The two are part of a coalition of business leaders and policy experts who have today announced a campaign, called 20 Miles More, which would see an additional 20 miles of track to link Liverpool directly to the HS2 network East of Warrington.

Birmingham

The campaign has published an open letter to Government signed by Lord Derby, urbanist Professor Sir Peter Hall, Tom Morris, Tom Cannon, Professor of Strategic Development at the University of Liverpool Management School,  Guy Wallis, founder of commercial law firm DWF, Professor Ian Wray, Trustee, Town & Country Planning Association,  Mersey Maritime Chief Executive Jim Teasdale and director of the Respublica think tank, Phillip Blond.

They say it would cost “as little as an additional £1.5bn” to the £42bn overall cost of HS2 and that it would provide a return of £2.70 for every £1 invested, compared to the projected £1.80 across the currently proposed network. 

The HS2 plan currently links London with Birmingham, Crewe, Manchester Airport and the city of Manchester with a branch line to Wigan, bypassing Warrington. 

The letter states: “Liverpool is vital to Britain’s status as a major trading nation. The city has in recent years experienced a remarkable renaissance and levels of economic growth second only to London. 

High-Speed-Rail-HS2-Route-Map-London-Birmingham-Manchester-Leeds 

 

"Just 20 Miles More rail route is needed to enable Liverpool to play its full part in supporting Britain’s economic renaissance – a small but crucial addition to the 330 mile HS2 network.”

Lord Derby: Calling for a faster way to get to LondonLord Derby: Calling for a
faster way to get to London
The campaign claims the link would help Liverpool and the wider city region boost its GVA by £400m a year -  worth £8bn over 20 years. Blond, who has been cited as "a driving force behind David Cameron's 'Big Society' agenda, said – “It’s imperative that Liverpool shares in the hugely enhanced connectivity that will be provided by HS2.

“It will otherwise be massively disadvantaged when trying to compete with other cities by relying on 19th century infrastructure, slower journey times and, potentially, reduced passenger capacity.’

Campaigners also point to the £1.8bn being spent on the Liverpool Superport to accommodate the latest Post-Panamax carriers. They say the investment will only realise its full potential if there is a corresponding increase in rail freight capacity engineered by transferring passenger services off the West Coast Main Line onto HS2.

Sense

 Andrew Morris, Director of 20 Miles More, said: “An HS2 link to Liverpool will ensure that the economic growth that is very much in evidence in the city will not be jeopardized. It will also greatly assist the Port of Liverpool which is undergoing a massive expansion to handle the latest generation of carriers by freeing up freight capacity on the West Coast Main Line.”

Professor Tom Cannon supported this notion, saying, ‘It makes sound economic sense to include Liverpool on the HS2 network, particularly as the potential return of £2.70 for every £1 invested in providing a branch to the city is greater than that projected for the rest of the network.’

Read the full letter here

 

Three cities and an economic stranglehold

Liverpool is in fifth place in a list of the top 10 UK cities for the creation of private sector jobs. 

Great news, but a study of the 60-page report by London-based think-tank Centre for Cities could just as well as be seen as a “dooms-day” book for the provinces (writes Larry Neild).

For a start London leaves everywhere else standing, but the report points out the combined economies of Manchester and Leeds is higher than the economy for the whole of Wales. 

In footballing language London is in the Premier League,  Manchester and Leeds are in the Championship and places like Liverpool hover in Division One. 

Throw HS2 into the equation and there is every likelihood an economic  stranglehold will eventually emerge, with London and the big three (Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham) sucking the lifeblood out of everywhere else. 

London is already a runaway train, with nothing able to halt it in its tracks. It attracts millions of twentysomethings every year, following in the footsteps of Dick Whittington in search of fortunes. 

HS2 will make that exodus from the provinces even easier. It’s why there are calls for Liverpool to be guaranteed sweeteners to offset the negative impact of 250mph trains from London into Manchester. 

Promises that at some time in the future, when anybody reading this will almost certainly be kicking the provincial daisies up, HS2 just might find its way to Lime Street, though by then we may once again be a village. 

Mayor Joe Anderson has welcomed the CforC report which shows 12,800 private sector jobs were created in Liverpool between 2010 and 2012. It ranked Liverpool fifth, ahead of Leeds and Nottingham, and just one place behind Manchester. 

There’s little doubt Mayor Anderson is well on the way to fulfil his pledge to attract thousands more jobs to the city. 

The problem for Liverpool, and other cities, is that London is virtually treated like a state within a state, with King Boris as its head. The Mayor of London has enormous powers, yet even they are not as powerful as those granted to the smaller ‘states’ of Scotland and Wales. 

The way to balance things, says Centre for Cities, is for mayors such as Joe Anderson to be given far greater powers, and the right to spend locally raised taxes right here in the city. 

Even if the Government agreed to devolve more powers to the provinces, that runaway train called London, would continue.

Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great reviews, news, deals and savings.

7 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.

AnonymousJanuary 31st 2014.

Could the people behind this campaign please answer two questions? Firstly what will be the additional tax burden/cost to Liverpool? The Command Paper which sets out the principles of how HS2 would be funded says this about supplementary costs to be born by cities on the line: "where there are parties who would benefit directly from the opportunities and the development that HS2 would generate – for example property developers, other major businesses or local authorities on the line of route – it is fair and right that they work collaboratively with the Government on options to support the project financially. Depending on specific circumstances, this might involve the commitment of funds, the commitment of land, or the alignment of local investment plans (for example in regard to HS2 stations)" Secondly, what happens if the Government says no? Will Liverpool then oppose HS2?

Martin SlomanJanuary 31st 2014.

The analysis that 20 Miles More has done shows that the benefits to the Liverpool City Region could be above £800 million per year. That compares to the £50million per annum LOSS that HS2 accountants KPMG believe could accrue to the city should the current plans go ahead. Funding for the new line would be from the same source as that for the remainder of the network and the 20MM analysis shows that the Benefit:Cost ratio would be 2.7, which is higher than that for the main line itself. In fact, it is possible that, should an alignment to the West of Warrington be adopted - as 20MM is urging HS2 to investigate - that the cost of the new line could be lower than at present. Not only that, the important town of Warrington - by-passed by the present proposal - would have a direct connection. 20MM has identified routes into the centre of Liverpool that could be achieved with minimal disruption or property demolition. There are two sites in the centre of the city that would be ideal for a Liverpool terminus - with good connections to both the extensive Merseyrail network and the main local road network. Don't forget that it is not just journey time to London that matters - it is the freeing up of capacity - particularly on the West Coast Main Line that will allow far greater passenger and freight connectivity in the future. That is very important as the coming Liverpool 2 Post Panamax terminal will quadruple the rail freight emanating from the port. It is also important that the city has connectivity to other centres - Manchester, Leeds, Birmingham, Glasgow and Edinburgh, which this freed up capacity will allow. Unlike most groups formed in response to HS2, 20MM is supportive of the proposal. All we need is 20 Miles More.

Martin SlomanJanuary 31st 2014.

I would add in response to Larry Neild's article that 20MilesMore were not formed to support HS2 but to support a link to Liverpool from HS2. The economic argument is that London has superb connectivity to cities in this country and also across the world - no UK city can hope to match that. Obviously, HS2 will increase that connectivity and, therefore the 'Dick Whittington' effect that Larry alludes to. However, London's Achilles heel is its extremely high business costs - much higher than in Liverpool, Manchester or other provincial cities. For a city on the HS2 network to prosper, it is very important for it to increase its connectivity to other cities. That is the crux of the matter. The present HS2 proposals free up no capacity north of Crewe. So, Liverpool will not be able to expand its links to other cities (either passenger or freight). In particular, the presently congested section of the West Coast main railway line north of Crewe will not be relieved by HS2 and our new trains (plus those from Warrington) will share that stretch with the fourfold increase in railfreight from the Port of Liverpool. That is why we need to press for this 20MilesMore of rail route.

Sepp FryerFebruary 3rd 2014.

It would be nice to see some support comments from the great and the good of the Manchester Business Community supporting this Northwest bid. Can’t help thinking this won’t materialise for whatever reason though!!!!

1 Response: Reply To This...
John BradleyFebruary 3rd 2014.

Be nice to see some Liverpool Polticos comment. No comments from Joe, Kennedy, Ellman, Berger, Eagle, Kemp, Rotheram, Twigg, MEPs, Councillors etc etc. The Echo is prepared to campaign about all sorts of things as long as the play up the Scally view of Liverpool. In this case can they even organise a petition>

To post this comment, you need to login.Please complete your login information.
OR CREATE AN ACCOUNT HERE..
Or you can login using Facebook.

Latest Rants

Anonymous

I agree with the Councillor. His examples really don't go far enough, because of the complexities…

 Read more
Anonymous

Perhaps a "dolmus" system could be used in the city centre, they work quite well for tourists and…

 Read more
Fairminded

Not price related but sad to see that they are doing away with the Citylink bus. This runs around…

 Read more
Anonymous

Thank you Woo

 Read more

Explore The Site

© Mark Garner t/a Confidential Direct 2017

Privacy | Careers | Website by: Planet Code